Visit our Business Solutions website >>

HP Photosmart 320

HP Photosmart 320
alaScore 79

155 reviews

Apr, 2024

alaTest has collected and analyzed 155 reviews of HP Photosmart 320. The average rating for this product is 3.9/5, compared to an average rating of 4.3/5 for other Digital Compact Cameras for all reviews. Reviewers really like the image quality and screen. The price and portability are also mentioned favorably. The storage and viewfinder get mixed comments, while some have doubts about the lens and performance.

usability, portability, price, screen, image quality

zoom, battery, memory, performance, lens

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Digital Compact Cameras the HP Photosmart 320 is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 79/100 = Good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 155 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

User Reviews  

Showing 33 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 16 of 33 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (122)

Consumer review (amazon.co.uk)

Amazon.co.uk review summary for HP Photosmart 320

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 4 user reviews of HP Photosmart 320 from Amazon.co.uk. The average user rating for this product is 3.0/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.3/5 for other Digital Compact Cameras on Amazon.co.uk. Reviewers are impressed by the storage. The usability is also appreciated.

portability, usability, storage

100% of the reviews on Amazon.co.uk give this product a positive rating.

Apr, 2024

Consumer review (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for HP Photosmart 320

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 2 user reviews of HP Photosmart 320 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 3.0/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.2/5 for other Digital Compact Cameras on Amazon.com. Reviewers are impressed by the usability. There are some critical comments about the battery.

usability

battery

50% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

Apr, 2024

Expert review by : PC Magazine (pcmag.com)

HP Photosmart 320

 

Like the A201 , the HP Photosmart 320 ($200 street) is easy to use out of the gate, but the on/off button is flaky. While using the 320, I was never completely sure it was doing what I wanted. Also like the A201, the 320 shoots both still images and...

Sep, 2002

Consumer review (ciao.com)

Quick review of HP PhotoSmart 320

 

This was a great camera at the time it came out. Now it is our back-up since it has a long delay when photographing, and it uses batteries rather quickly. For a beginner, this camera is good and reasonably priced. For an advanced user, you may want to...

May, 2008

Consumer review (epinions.com)

Yes, it is cheap.. In more ways then one.

 

Well, it does take pictures.. And it's cheap.

Eats Batteries, focus is garbage, plastic lens is ~too~ cheap and scratches easily, don't bother.

Nov, 2005

Consumer review (epinions.com)

HP Photosmart 320 user, not a simply critic.

 

This review is intended for who wants to buy an used HP320 camera or even a new one. I'm not a professional photograph, and all that I will write here is according to my 2 years experience with this camera. 1 - If you want to take photos where the...

Simply to use.

Read my testimonial, I have this camera!

Jan, 2005

Consumer review (epinions.com)

A Good Buy For Today's Entry-Level Digital Photography

 

I purchased this camera brand new on an eBay auction for US$62.00 which I thought was a great price for a 2.1 megapixel camera with an LCD display and a reputable brand name to boot. I'm not one of these early adapters who must have everything when it...

Low Price, Reputable Brand. Most of the features you would need for basic digital photography

No optical zoom ; low internal memory ; bulky ; LCD screen very poor in low light situations

May, 2004

Consumer review (epinions.com)

Insert Clever Camera Title Here

 

I bought my hp photosmart 320 in February 2003 primarily for e-mailing and uploading to the web, and the 2.1 megapixels are more than enough for great-looking onscreen images. You can select from 3 levels of resolution and use the one you ...

Great for sharing online, easy to edit, reasonable price, includes 8 MB memory

Lack of clear zoom capability

Apr, 2004

Consumer review (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard Photosmart 320

 

I love this camera I do a gift basket business and this is great for taking close up pictures to show my customers in my portfolio what they can get. This a very good camera. I got it with the printer deal.

close up and distance photos

not enough megapixels

Dec, 2003

Consumer review (epinions.com)

HP Photosmart 320, A Good Gift for the Holidays?

 

The HP Photosmart 320 Digital Camera is a great family camera. With just the click of one button you have a digital good quality picture you can print out or email. The camera is average size and weight for a digital and the 1.5" lcd screen is great ...

Easy to use, good quality, great for snap shots.

Only 2x or 4x zoom, increasing zoom decreases quality, battery life.

Dec, 2003

Consumer review (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard Photosmart 320

 

This is a great little camera! I have taken over 500 pictures with this camera over the last year and have been very pleased with the results. I took it on vacation to Yellowstone and was able to get some very good pictures. It is a simple camera to...

Small enough to fit in a pocket. 2.1 MegaPixel so it will print 8x10s.

No optical zoom (you get what you pay for) The flash is too close to the lens, so you get red eye. If you use the LCD viewer it really uses up the batteries (use the viewfinder if possible).

Dec, 2003

Consumer review (pcphotoreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard Photosmart 320

 
Dec, 2003

Price comparison for HP Photosmart 320

Top 5 Digital Cameras